Complex: F1 owner Bernie Ecclestone - the system is calculated by several intra-group loans being set up
Formula One has paid just £1million in corporation tax despite raking in profits of in excess of £300m it has been revealed.
The
shocking figures have been disclosed in a prospectus for the planned
floatation of Formula One on the Singapore stock exchange.
Via
a series of complex tax arrangements, Formula One, which is run by
billionaire Bernie Ecclestone, paid a net contribution of just £945,663
to the taxman in 2011 on revenues of £980m.
The most recent figures show
that Formula One, whose biggest shareholder is Luxembourg-based private
equity firm CVC Capital, made profits of £305m for the same period
largely from the sale of television rights, race fees and advertising
and sponsorship deals.
However,
via a system of intra-group loans, Formula One has saved millions in
corporation tax while an article in the Independent claims the massive
reduction has been made courtesy of an ‘arrangement’ with HM Revenue and
Customs.
The standard rate
of cooperation tax in the United Kingdom is 24 per cent of a company’s
profit. But Formula One has slashed its tax bill by taking out
£2.5billion worth of loans from offshore companies within the group. The
interest on the loans, which amounted to £387.7m in 2011, is tax
deductible and thus Formula One has managed to engineer a mammoth saving
in the UK.
'Efficient tax position': The super-popular sport has a healthy profit
And despite the clamour for tax
avoidance loopholes to be closed, with companies such as Google and
Starbucks in the spotlight in recent months, Formula One expects its
money spinning arrangement to remain in place for the foreseeable
future.
The flotation
prospectus states that Formula One has ‘an efficient tax position’,
adding: ‘The group’s tax charge is materially dependent on the amount of
UK tax relief available to it for interest expense on certain
intra-group loans. We expect our aggregate cash tax payments to remain
broadly consistent with prior years.’
No comments:
Post a Comment